[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > <Eduard Witteveen:> > >>Well, what do you dont understand(or is not clear)? > > > I think the texts suggested by Pierre are adequate. > Based on these you can make the documentation, that should go in the > taglib documentation, and that has been missing all along.In that case I'm willing >to vote in favor. > > Hopefully we won't have to have a lengthy discussion next time a hack is > proposed. Writing documentation is a skill in itself, but worth putting > some time and effort in.
Maybe it's better to first discuss a new feature and after this ask for a vote. This way the final proposal for the vote has been discussed about, issues could be resolved, documention can be made better, before voting. Gerard btw I'm +1 on the loginpage.
