On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 11:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > - an attribute should be used. The notation <mm:field name="html(foo)" /> > is queer and unnecessarily confusing. Till the time we have a alternative, i would say we have to update the documentation with the 'html(fieldname)' sollution. I dont like it either, but it makes us more clear we have to do _something_ about it..
-- Eduard Witteveen Systeem Ontwikkelaar NOS Internet, Gateway C Kamer 107 +31(0)356772910 http://www.omroep.nl/ Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? : The sixth Satire from Juvenal
