Pierre van Rooden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think the problem with jars in CVS is that CVS tends to parse/alter > code (i.e. replace $Id$ codes). There may be other problems too. CVS > _seems_ mainly intended for text.
I agree, but my remark was only that IMHO _size_ is not an issue, so that as far as i am concerned that argument better can be dropped.. > Anyway I don't see much point in keeping a cvs of jars. I do. It would be _very_ convenient. Michiel -- mihxil' Michiel Meeuwissen Mediapark C101 Hilversum +31 (0)35 6772979 []()
