> > The main disadvantage is I suppose that it doesn't 'feel right' to check
> > external products in CVS. and that all kind of stuff should also be
> > checked in because they must be distributed together or something like
> > that.
>
> A big -1 for this.....(large) binary files do not belong in cvs, because
>   cvs isn't good at handling these files.

Are you talking form experiance?
I have been doing that for ages.. (just co speeltuin/keesj)
or wiab where mmbase is "just an other" .jar we need

for site created a long time ago like worldpressphoto the hole site + "mmbase 
application 1.0" + orion + mmbase sources are in CVS (that's the only way to 
be able to maintain the old stuff)

as long as you add the binaries as binaries "-kb" the "problem" doesn't exist 
IMHO

>
> Another idea good be to put these jars somewhere on mmbase.org, but this
> could give some licensing problems, because iirc the idea was to start
> using the j2ee package for developing, this may not be redistributed.

I said I would look into that or have you already?
I haven't followed the java 1.3 1.4 diffs but in 1.4 pooling datasources is 
standard for 1.2 you can download the jdbc-std-ext and there are 
"open-source" pooling datasources
What can be in cvs or on the mmbase web-site?


>
> Gerard



Reply via email to