Johannes Verelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 11:09, Pierre van Rooden wrote: > > Johannes Verelst wrote: > > > I vote [+1] if and only if the JSP editors are production-quality for > > > all supported application servers, and it doesn't negatively affect the > > > time-schedule for the upcoming 1.6 release. Otherwise, I vote [-1]. > > > > Can you specify how you like to determine production quality (asside > > from being bug-free)? > > I agree it is a vague phrase, but let's define it as being free from > bugs and performing reasonably. > > > I know that Tomcat 4.0 has performance problems with taglibs, but that > > is a Tomcat problem (it will not dissapear with another MMBase release). > > Tomcat 4.1 performes much better from what I hear. > > If we would drop 4.0 from the supported-appserver list, then there might > indeed not be a problem. Unfortunately, 4.0 needs to be supported in 1.6 > as noted in the thread following the 1.6 release call.
As I pointed out earlier. The jsp-editors are only _a_ way to edit your data. It is still possible to turn scan on, use other jsp-editors or even editwizard, and if only that would prove to be necessary to use tomcat 4.0, it still could be with some right called 'supported'. Michiel -- mihxil' Michiel Meeuwissen Mediapark C101 Hilversum +31 (0)35 6772979 []()
