On Wednesday 18 June 2003 10:43 am, Michiel Meeuwissen wrote:
> Kees Jongenburger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > it might event be worse.. what about having the bridge in it's onw package so 
> > "somebody" can write an other mmbase bridge implementation?
> 
> Nice idea, but I suppose that one would call that application not 'basic'. We could 
> start to think
> of this, when it actually is possible to plug in another bridge implementation, 
> which AFAIK is not
> currently the case.
This is what i ment.. of course :)
don't rewrite the bridge interface... but the core..




Reply via email to