On Wednesday 18 June 2003 10:45 am, Rob Vermeulen wrote: > > > > > > > it might event be worse.. what about having the bridge in it's onw > > > package so > > > > > > "somebody" can write an other mmbase bridge implementation? > > > > > I disagree. The bridge is in my opinion something that belongs to the > > MMBase core. It defines a standard interface on which application can be > > build. Creating different interfaces will make things less standardized > > and more hard for people to make applications that work on 'all' MMBase > > systems. > > > Of course i was speaking here about the MMCI (interface). > nevertheless i think that pieces of source code that are really 'needed' > to be able to run MMBase, belong to the core. yes sorry what I ment to say was
"somebody" can write an other implementation of the bridge? and not "somebody" can write an other mmbase bridge implementation? Therefore if the bridge interface is not in the current core this opens the possibility do do such things (lest say 3 bridge implemenations that call each other?) bridge interface bridge security implementation remote bridge implementation "bridge core" implementation > > Rob > > > -- Kees Jongenburger Mediapark C101 Hilversum +31 (0)35 6772910
