Michiel Meeuwissen wrote:
Pierre van Rooden wrote:
Hence, my initial impulse is to move all ObjectTypes code to TypeDef.
I agree, 'typedef' is a not optimally clear, but traditionally much used
(not only in MMBase, but also in C...), and I think it is hardly an option
to rename the builder itself, so I'd say that the builder implementation
should be named the same.
Two classes for one builder is indeed one too many. I am undecided
on the name though. As TypeDef is indeed the 'classical' name, however
ObjectTypes reflects the content more. For me TypeDef gets a slight
preference as I got used to it using MMBase all this time.
--
Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
"You call it untidy, I call it LRU ordered" -- Daniel Barlow
