On Oct 25, 2004, at 11:30 AM, Rico Jansen wrote:
Michiel Meeuwissen wrote:Pierre van Rooden wrote:Hence, my initial impulse is to move all ObjectTypes code to TypeDef.
I agree, 'typedef' is a not optimally clear, but traditionally much used
(not only in MMBase, but also in C...), and I think it is hardly an option
to rename the builder itself, so I'd say that the builder implementation
should be named the same.
Two classes for one builder is indeed one too many. I am undecided on the name though. As TypeDef is indeed the 'classical' name, however ObjectTypes reflects the content more. For me TypeDef gets a slight preference as I got used to it using MMBase all this time.
The builder name can't be changes without breaking some software imho, even if i might
like to see the new name i don't think its a good idea, its in so many (extern) code and docs
and presentations etc etc.
Daniel.
