Pierre van Rooden wrote: > Michiel Meeuwissen wrote: > >'XMLOutputStreamWriter'? > > Or 'ResourceWriter', since that is what it is used for?
Not necessarily. The same functionality is present e.g. in mm:include implemenation. Of course, when this class available, the mm:include implemenation can be simplified, and then it will not only be used for resources any more. > I don't really care about names, 'RelationalDatabaseStorageManager' > isn't exactly short either. > But in general I think it probably best to try and keep names short > (though functional). I think correctness and sufficient discrimination are more important than shortness. If those cannot be achieved with a short name, a long name must be used. The functionality of the class under concern is quite specific and precisely defined, so I would not mind a long name for it, and we should not change it to 'ResourceWriter' only because that is shorter. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen mihxil' Mediacentrum 140 H'sum [] () +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US
