I'd like to clarify a bit what I mean by "Facebook-ifying Drupal.org": with the 
Facebook API and their Apps, a large proportion of the "FB experience" is 
created by 3rd parties and simply available through facebook.com. If d.o were 
to enable people to create, contribute, load and run mini-modules that simply 
implement blocks for the user's d.o profile - THAT RIGHT THERE becomes the 
essence and "killer app" of the future of drupal support. To demonstrate some 
API or module feature - there's a mini-module-block with working logic. When 
someone has a support issue, they post a mini-module-block containing the 
paired down working logic of just their issue. When someone has an idea for a 
better rating/flagging/commenting system for d.o, they contribute a 
mini-module-block to d.o that implements it, where people can try it, learn 
from it, modify it themselves, and use it for their comments on d.o. Every API 
page has operating mini-module-blocks demonstrating how that API function 
works. 

Yes, not every support issue nor every API or module feature can be 
demonstrated in a mini-module-block, but a huge proportion of them can, and 
their availability will remove an exponential amount of the new-to-drupal 
support issues. 

I'm not thinking we'd get "MySpace"... I'm thinking we'd get 
"MySlashdotGeekbook" because the d.o community has broken it's learning into 
mini-digestible nuggets, enabling anyone curious about web development to play 
in our rich API sandbox, and we're all about making and showing each other how 
to make. 

Yes, some people's profiles will be an eyesore nightmare like the worst of 
MySpace - but that's good because that person made it that way, and they could, 
and they learned from doing so. 

I also think that if d.o were to do this, there's a possibility of the game 
developer community invading. Wanna have lot's of fun? Attract the game 
developer geeks to drupal. That's actually where I come from. (I was on both 
the 3DO and the PlayStation OS teams.) Drupal's already got everything 
necessary... and it's not like game developers like giving Facebook a huge 
chunk of their revenue. 

Sincerely,
-Blake
[email protected]
www.BlakeSenftner.com
www.MissingUbercartManual.com

On Mar 19, 2011, at 9:55 PM, William Smith wrote:

> 
> 
> If drupal becomes another "Facebook", how soon will it be before the same 
> issues crop up, ie; can't find what your looking for , can't get a decent 
> support response, blah, blah, blah.... How soon will "Drupal Facebook" become 
> "Drupal MySpace"
> 
> If subsites crop up to help with the load, whose going to be the main 
> repository, drupal or the subsite if that's where everyone starts to go. 
> Social networking is great for some, but I have seen many sites come and go. 
> In the end it all boils down to the individual, what they want, how they 
> learn, and whether they are willing to give back to the community, even if 
> its only to say "Hey you might want to give drupal a shot."
> 
> As someone once said "everything matters", how we deal with "everything" will 
> eventually determine the outcome of drupal and whether our community thrives.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 3/19/2011 9:34 PM, Randy Fay wrote:
>> 
>> I agree that drupal.org becoming "facebook", where both real-time and 
>> support interactions would be welcome and managed well would be fantastic.
>> 
>> And we could do that with subsites that don't need such careful supervision.
>> 
>> Why couldn't we let members of the community launch subsites like 
>> support.drupal.org and make of them what they could? Or launch a chat site 
>> specifically for support that had far more sophisticated features than IRC? 
>> 
>> IMO this is good thinking.
>> 
>> -Randy
>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to