Hi! > > > Not yet. Yes, it will be a huge number. > > > > Which compels the questions: > > > > 1) is it worth it? > > No.
What about those people who want (or must) implement clean interfaces in their code using standard size_t? Even if the number of objects/sizes/counts is usually below 2^31, it still is a pain to either suffer from numerous static analysis warnings (when implicitly converting size_t and int) or from implementing numerous casts. In my book it would be a BIG improvement if the Qt interfaces would cleanly integrate into compliant environments without nasty workarounds. Qt's int-loaded API is probably not the most burning pain when using Qt but definitely the most persisting one (for me). -- Best Regards, Bernhard _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
