On Tuesday, 4 December 2018 12:02:05 PST Ville Voutilainen wrote: > A *very* big part of why span's size is being changed to unsigned is > consistency, rather than the committee thinking > that unsigned is necessarily the right kind of type. There's some > ongoing work to alleviate the compatibility issues > between signed and unsigned types, but that work will most likely not > bear fruit in time for C++20.
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p0907r4.html -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
