On Friday, 13 de January de 2012 14.10.09, Robin Burchell wrote: > 2012/1/13 Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com>: > > So, changing the name of this function is: > > > > - of little practical benefit > > - not 100% automatable without a code scanner > > - dangerous, as it creates silent bugs > > what about the slightly more garden-variety approach of deprecating > the old one and introducing a new method?
It's a virtual, which means both methods must be virtual and they will be
there until 6.0. I frankly think it's worse to have *both* createRequest and
createReply.
I'll let the proponents of this change figure out how to have both virtuals,
both overridable and do the right thing.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
