On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Olivier Goffart <oliv...@woboq.com> wrote: > /me wonder why we still even care about QT_NO_STL
I was originally on the side of caring about QT_NO_STL, but your message made me wonder (again) about just how necessary this is. I think the only target I'd consider really valid for this would be Android, but from some research, apparently newer Android even ships an STL as part of the NDK (sans some features like exceptions), and for older NDKs, I guess bundling might be a solution. So I'm not sure how relevant that really is. Consider me a tentative +1 unless someone chirps up with a good platform-based reason for this. Assuming it isn't an issue (and I guess it's looking like that may be the case), it would indeed make things a lot easier. Just deprecate everything we don't like the look of, and use STL directly. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
