On 1/27/2012 4:14 PM, ext João Abecasis wrote:
> - Provide standard-compliant implementations of the algorithms in
> QtAlgorithms (no 'q' prefixes, no camel casing -- sorry!) and
> selectively import those into a known namespace when QT_NO_STL is
> defined:
>
> namespace QtPrivateStd {
> #ifdef QT_NO_STL
> using namespace std;
> #else
> using namespace QtPrivateStlImpl::std;
> #endif
> }
>
> Utilities in QtPrivateStlImpl would be based on what is already in
> QtAlgorithms, changed to syntactically and semantically match the
> standard library.
Hi,
I think this is a good idea. I've caught myself including both
<QtAlgorithms> and <algorithm> in a file for the sake of sticking to the
Qt ones when possible (due to style/convention). This would then be a
nice mindset change.
It's probably worth to remember that for consistency this might require
adding more versions of the algorithms already existent in QtAlgorithms.
I think at least qEqual doesn't have a version which takes a binary
predicate (as the STL does).
Cheers,
Leandro
--
Leandro T. C. Melo
Software Engineer
Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
Nokia gate5 GmbH
Firmensitz: Invalidenstr. 117, 10115 Berlin, Germany
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, Berlin: HRB 106443B
Umsatzsteueridentifikationsnummer: DE 812 845 193
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Michael Halbherr, Karim Tähtivuori
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
