On Sunday 15 April 2012 20:38:22 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On segunda-feira, 16 de abril de 2012 00.08.43, Olivier Goffart wrote: > > On Saturday 14 April 2012 20:06:53 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > > > So, after *too many* commits[1] -- QHash randomization was merged a > > > few hours ago! > > > > > > https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtbase/commit/c01eaa438200edc9a3bbcd8ae1e8de > > > d0 > > > 58 bea268 > > > > > > Thanks to all of the guys involved for the ideas, feedback, reviewing > > > the patches... and staging them :-) > > > > Nice work! > > > > I'm just not really happy with the fact that you removed the optimisation > > for int to avoid storing both the hash and the key. > > It was stored as the same field because hash and key were the same. > > if you salt the hash, it's no longer the same. Therefore, they can't share a > field.
By not salting the hash for integer. Or only doing it before applying the % _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
