On terça-feira, 17 de abril de 2012 10.34.33, Paul Olav Tvete wrote: > I do not agree with this change. We have made a difference between public > API and plugin API, and this is different from private implementation > detail.
And during the previous discussion, I questioned that difference. No one of you
replied with the rationale on why we need this distinction.
If we don't promise binary compatibility anyway, how is it different from
private API?
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
