On quinta-feira, 19 de abril de 2012 05.45.29, Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: > Hi Guys, > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since there's been no proposal, here's an alternate proposal: > > 1. We drop _qpa completely. So, it would become qplatformbackingstore.h > > 2. We teach syncqt that qplatform* is special and we move them all to > > a special qpa/ directory. So, instead of #include > > <QtGui/private/qplatformbackingstore.h>, it will be #include > > <QtGui/qpa/qplatformbackingstore.h> > > 3. We teach syncqt to create <QtGui/QPA> or #include <QPA> headers. (I > > think we need the latter since qpa headers are not restricted to gui) > > 4. We teach the world that qpa is not meant for apps. > > 5. Add a more benign header pointing out the fact that these files are > > qpa files. > > 6. Rename the handle() to platformXXX() since it's easy to educate > > that anything that has platform in it is out of reach of app > > developers. > > Paul did say on irc this proposal sounds 'better', but I am not sure > that means I have his +2. Is this any better? (read: compromise) > > How should I proceed?
Go ahead.
And good luck with syncqt. Don't forget "qplatform" can appear elsewhere
(e.g., qplatformdefs.h)
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
