Hi, > 1. Qt SDK vs Ubuntu repo install - Currently, Qt SDK is a separate > download from Nokia website. Ubuntu packages creator and Qt. This > could cause confusion as to which to choose. I think the decision made > here was that this is not entirely solvable since Qt SDK contains much > more than creator and Qt (it has the sysroots and toolchains required > for the devices). Is it possible for us to bundle sysroots and > toolchains separately? That way, ubuntu repos can be the definitive > place to download creator and qt.
Are you saying that I'll have to download Qt 5 for my Fedora 17 from an Ubuntu repository ? I think I didn't understand this point. > 2. Rename our qt5 tool binaries - the binary names of moc, uic, qmake > conflict in qt3 and qt4. Now with qt5, we will have another conflict. > Is it possible to rename all our tool binaries to be moc5, qmake5? Are > Qt4 qmake and Qt5 qmake completely compatible (I think not). Ossi, > comments? Why not to rename qmake (from Qt3 and Qt4) as qmake-qt3 and qmake-qt4 respectively in the distribution ? > 4. gerrit does not have a patch download system. For the moment, you > can use gitorious like > http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtbase/commit/f1ea4ed3d4b45b2eda0a695c61f743cecc0644da?format=patch git fetch https://codereview.qt-project.org/p/qt/qtbase refs/changes/45/26045/1 && git format-patch -1 --stdout FETCH_HEAD You can get this link from the Web UI Cheers, -- Sergio Ahumada Navea s...@sansano.inf.utfsm.cl _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development