Hi Thiago, [you knew this would be coming, I don't let you down]
On Monday June 18 2012, Thiago Macieira wrote: > * port QList Before actually porting QList (esp. as I take the above to mean that QList won't be bound to void* slots anymore): Is there than *anything* in QList that QVector doesn't do at least as good or that could be ported over to QVector (reserving space in front for prepends comes to mind, though I'd argue that code that uses this a lot is broken by design anyway). So, can we please just have the equivalent of template <typename T> using QList = QVector<T>; after moving the members that QList has but QVector lacks over to QVector? I'd be more than happy to volunteer a patch. I haven't seen a single Qt developer team (Qt devs not excepting) that is fully aware of the performance characteristics and memory layout of QList. Most just use it because it has a nicer name than QVector. Thanks, Marc -- Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
