On quarta-feira, 20 de junho de 2012 08.52.55, Marc Mutz wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > [you knew this would be coming, I don't let you down] > > On Monday June 18 2012, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > * port QList > > Before actually porting QList (esp. as I take the above to mean that QList > won't be bound to void* slots anymore): Is there than *anything* in QList > that QVector doesn't do at least as good or that could be ported over to > QVector (reserving space in front for prepends comes to mind, though I'd > argue that code that uses this a lot is broken by design anyway). > > So, can we please just have the equivalent of > template <typename T> > using QList = QVector<T>; > after moving the members that QList has but QVector lacks over to QVector?
My plan is *almost* that.
QList<T> will be a QVector<T> if
sizeof(T) < 32
T is movable
Otherwise, QList<T> will be backed by a QVector<T *> and the pointer will be
dereferenced in the accessor functions.
The value of 32 is chosen because it will be the size of QVariant on 64-bit
platforms.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
