On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:09 PM, a.gra...@gmail.com <a.gra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2 August 2012 15:02, <lars.kn...@nokia.com> wrote:
>> For Qt as a product, it is now really important to remember that we do have
>> the Qt project and a live and active community around it. This might make
>> some things a bit more difficult in the short term, but we will find ways to
>> deal with this and to continue to move Qt forward.
>
> I think that until Nokia keeps controling Qt we won't move much.
>
> I explain better what I mean. Nobody can stop us to keep contributing
> to Qt and developing Qt.
> We can use in any opensource project we want. But what about companies
> and commercial products?!
It's possible to use LGPL Qt in the commercial products,
it's only necessary to open changes done to the Qt itself if any.
Usually it's better to submit the changes upstream,
it reduces the maintenance burden quite a bit.
Regards
Dmytro.
>
> People still need to buy a license from Digia.
>
> Is Digia allowed to license Qt for mobile development? I'm just asking...
>
> --
> Andrea Grandi - Nokia-FNDC/Tampere / Qt Ambassador
> Ubuntu Member: https://launchpad.net/~andreagrandi
> website: http://www.andreagrandi.it
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
