On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 03:23:06PM +0300, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote: > On 2 August 2012 15:15, Dmytro Poplavskiy <dmytro.poplavs...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It's possible to use LGPL Qt in the commercial products, > > it's only necessary to open changes done to the Qt itself if any. > > I will try to be more specific with my question :) > > What kind of license is using RIM for their Cascades UI? It's based on > Qt/QML, but as fra as I know they are submitting patches upstream > (please correct me if I'm wrong). RIM is using Qt open source (LGPL).
> What kind of license is using Jolla, for example? > > What I'm trying to understand is if there are any possible > restrictions or problems using Qt for a mobile products both if Nokia > is keeping Qt alive, or if they just abandon it or if they sell it or > whatever.... To be really honest, generally I wouldn't think so, as Qt is LGPL. Of course, if Nokia pulls the plug, we are likely to have lesser contributions happening to Qt, which I believe will certainly impact the project - but imho not to the point of killing it. -- Rafael Roquetto | rafael.roque...@kdab.com | Software Engineer Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, a KDAB Group company Tel. Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090, USA +1-866-777-KDAB(5322) KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-independent software solutions
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
