On 28.08.2012 19:59, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote: > On 28/08/2012 12:48, ext Peter Kümmel wrote: >> On 28.08.2012 19:27, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote: >>> On 28/08/2012 12:16, ext Peter Kümmel wrote: >>>> Have I missed something or is building with mingw in cmd.exe not supported? >>> >>> This is not your fault, it's the rubenvb release which is broken, as the >>> GNU Make tool provided is not properly splitting the file paths. Thus, >>> mingw32-make is trying to stat the wrong files and cannot find all the >>> files required. >>> >>> If you're feeling adventurous, I've found that you can do a binary patch >>> by simply replacing the pattern 0x003a3b00 with 0x003b3b00 in >>> mingw32-make.exe, and it should do the path splitting correctly and find >>> the required files. >>> >>> Note that this is just a work-around, and Ruben will have to correct the >>> way he cross-compiles the MinGW tools. >>> >>> See >>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3545000&group_id=202880&atid=983354 >>> for details. >> >> Ahh thanks. >> >> But also jom fails, I thought jom could also handle mingw makefiles? > > No, Jom only handles NMake makefiles, afaik. >
Checked it again: I could build qt/4.8 with jom. So I would say the Makefiles in Qt5 are broken (at least for configure). Peter _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development