>I'm not sure if we want to go down this route (doxygen), but it seems an >option to me.
We have discussed it many times. The management decision has always been to proceed with qdoc. I don't feel strongly either way, but if I'm asked I would say we should stay with qdoc and just move qdoc gradually toward doxygen. The qdoc index file was originally meant to allow a customer to link his documentation to the Qt documentation, so we generated the Qt documentation with qdoc, and as a byproduct, qdoc produced qt.index, which is then loaded with the customers sourses when qdoc generates the customer's documentation. So, functionally, qt.index is like a doxygen tag file, but I don't like the implementation, so I think we should add the doxygen tag file functionality to qdoc. qdoc already has something called a tag file, but this is for a different purpose. I think we might not need it anymore. Earlier I proposed getting qdoc to output a "target" file, which I suppose is the same as the doxygen tag file. martin
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
