>Anyway, what is the plan right now? Don't do anything for the desktop >components till Qt 5 is released then developing the desktop >components further till they are perfect and ready to be released with >Qt 5.1?
That is a reasonable proposal. Perhaps they could be an addon to Qt 5.0. To be honest we are still discussing exactly how to move Qt forward with Digia as we only very recently signed our contracts and started getting an overview on the new teams. What I do know is that Digia has shown a real interest in bringing Qt Quick to the desktop so I would say the future of this particular project already looks more promising than it was within Nokia. There are of course plenty of things left to do before we can release them with Qt. They need to be polished more in Qt5, they need proper documentation, performance improvements, reducing widget dependencies and I guess simplified deployment should be high up on that list as well. Jens > > > ________________________________________ > Fra: [email protected] > [[email protected]] på vegne > av Mark [[email protected]] > Sendt: 3. oktober 2012 13:19 > To: Chris Meyer > Cc: development > Emne: Re: [Development] Qt desktop components project > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Chris Meyer <[email protected]> wrote: >> Some progress for the Desktop Components for Qt 5 / Quick2 was >> announced in June in this blog entry: >> >> http://blog.qt.digia.com/2012/06/06/desktop-components-for-qt-5/ >> >> However, the project isn't listed and there is no maintainer here: >> >> http://qt-project.org/wiki/Maintainers >> >> Is it possible to give some information about the future plans for >> this project? Is active development taking place? Will it eventually >> be an official component of the QtDeclarative module? >> _______________________________________________ >> Development mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development > > The development of that stuff "should" be here: > http://qt.gitorious.org/qtplayground/qtdesktopcomponents I say > "should" because there doesn't seem to be a lot of development in > there. > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
