On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Laszlo Papp <[email protected]> wrote: > Daker was also working on the Plasma Components project under the GSoC > umbrella, so I think he is familiar with the topic. :-) I believe this > is one of your best bets (and similar blog posts there): > > http://codecereal.blogspot.ie/2012/05/qml-themingstyling-update.html > > Laszlo
Yeah, i've read about that earlier. But is that something for Qt inclusion or is that for KDE? Or just an individual project? Something like that should imho end up as high upstream as possible this Qt in this case. > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Bache-Wiig Jens >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>Anyway, what is the plan right now? Don't do anything for the desktop >>>>components till Qt 5 is released then developing the desktop >>>>components further till they are perfect and ready to be released with >>>>Qt 5.1? >>> >>> That is a reasonable proposal. Perhaps they could be an addon to Qt 5.0. To >>> be honest we are still discussing exactly how to move Qt forward with Digia >>> as we only very recently signed our contracts and started getting an >>> overview on the new teams. What I do know is that Digia has shown a real >>> interest in bringing Qt Quick to the desktop so I would say the future of >>> this particular project already looks more promising than it was within >>> Nokia. >>> There are of course plenty of things left to do before we can release them >>> with Qt. They need to be polished more in Qt5, they need proper >>> documentation, performance improvements, reducing widget dependencies and I >>> guess simplified deployment should be high up on that list as well. >>> >>> Jens >> >> -- could you please bottom post, that really improves thread readability :) >> -- >> >> It sounds like the Qt Desktop Components have a bright future! I'm >> looking forward to using them besides using git clones ;) >> >> Anyway, a theming question. How can the QML Desktop Components >> currently be themed? Only by means of QStyle? Would there be a way to >> use kde's plasma themes in the QML Desktop Components? And do the >> desktop components depend on QWidgets only because of QStyle. >> >> // brainstorming >> It would be neat to have a theme plugin system. For example a >> structure like this: >> >> [ QStyle plugin ] -- [ Plasma plugin ] -- [ other plugin ] ... >> | | | >> --------------------[ Style API ]------------------ >> | >> [ Style ] (C++ class exposed to QML) >> >> System define: >> QML_COMPONENTS_PLUGIN=PluginName >> >> QML just "draws" the components in the selected style. >> >> This is just made up as i type this. I could be completely wrong, but >> this does allow you to make one plugin that is QWidget dependent (the >> QStyle plugin) thus it becomes easier to make the Desktop Components >> QWidget independent. You just have to provide a style plugin that >> doesn't depend on QWidgets :) >> // end brainstorming >> >> I don't know if there is already something like this in place for >> styling, if there is, please do tell me more about it. >> >> Cheers, >> Mark >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ________________________________________ >>>> Fra: [email protected] >>>> [[email protected]] på >>>> vegne av Mark [[email protected]] >>>> Sendt: 3. oktober 2012 13:19 >>>> To: Chris Meyer >>>> Cc: development >>>> Emne: Re: [Development] Qt desktop components project >>>> >>>> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Chris Meyer <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Some progress for the Desktop Components for Qt 5 / Quick2 was >>>>> announced in June in this blog entry: >>>>> >>>>> http://blog.qt.digia.com/2012/06/06/desktop-components-for-qt-5/ >>>>> >>>>> However, the project isn't listed and there is no maintainer here: >>>>> >>>>> http://qt-project.org/wiki/Maintainers >>>>> >>>>> Is it possible to give some information about the future plans for >>>>> this project? Is active development taking place? Will it eventually >>>>> be an official component of the QtDeclarative module? >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Development mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >>>> >>>> The development of that stuff "should" be here: >>>> http://qt.gitorious.org/qtplayground/qtdesktopcomponents I say >>>> "should" because there doesn't seem to be a lot of development in >>>> there. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Development mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >> _______________________________________________ >> Development mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
