On sexta-feira, 19 de outubro de 2012 01.57.16, André Pönitz wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 04:10:16PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On sexta-feira, 19 de outubro de 2012 01.03.29, André Pönitz wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 08:30:03AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > > lconvert -> lconvert5 > > > > lrelease -> lrelease5 > > > > lupdate -> lupdate5 > > > > > > Sorry, I don't get the joke. > > > > Because it was no joke. It's serious. > > What practical difference exists between calling a > Qt 4 based lconvert and a Qt 5 based lconvert?
Probably none. > What practical difference exists between calling a > Qt 4 based lconvert and a Qt 5 based lconvert _that > justifies changing the name_? Today? None. However, the maintainer for those particular tools is disinclined to promise that they will remain compatible with Qt 4. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
