On sexta-feira, 19 de outubro de 2012 07.45.15, Koehne Kai wrote: > I guess the reason is that there's already a qmlviewer - the Qt 4 one. If we > also go with qmlscene ->qml2viewer, we'd have > > qmlviewer -> qt4 > qml1viewer -> Qt 5, Qt Quick 1 > qml2viewer -> Qt 5, Qt Quick 2 > > Not exactly intuitive, is it ? Also, what happens if we release a Qt 6 with > a qml 2 compatibility viewer? > > Thinking about it, I'd rather keep the qmlviewer, qmlscene names, and go for > > qmlviewer -> qt 4 > qmlviewer5 -> qt 5 , qtquick 1 > qmlscene5 -> qt 5 , qtquick 2
Sounds like a plan. Any other supporters? I don't mind either way. I've done it the way I did because: > > [qml1plugindump had already been renamed] and I simply followed the logic that was already there. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
