On Friday, October 19, 2012 02:24:09 PM Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 01:24:37PM +0200, Simon Hausmann wrote: > > (1) It seems that there is an agreement on the naming of the libraries and > > pkg-config files. > > not really. i'm not as strongly opposed to it as to renaming the tools, > but i think renaming the libraries is mostly counterproductive, too: > - the change is linux-only. on mac it simply cannot be done (in the > framework case) and on windows it is already this way. the latter is > rather ugly, as mentioned before. > - it is entirely unnecessary for deployment, as shared object versioning > perfectly supports co-installed major versions > - it is sort-of unnecessary for development, as -I & -L can be used to > specify which libraries to build against
Wouldn't it be kind of weird though if the libQtCore.so symlink would live in say /usr/lib/qt5/lib but libQtCore.so.5.0.0 itself would be locacted in /usr/lib? (and then add multi-arch to the mix :) Simon _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
