On sexta-feira, 19 de outubro de 2012 19.32.05, Laszlo Papp wrote: > I have not personally been much fan of that schema... Thiago, I hope > your next proposal will not be qmake5.0, qmake5.1 and the like based > upon some "python precedence".
Even though python does install python3.2 and python3.3, the name that people run is "python3", as seen in many scripts: #!/usr/bin/env python3 So I really don't care if we have qmake5.0, qmake5.1, qmake5.1.2-digia3, so long as there's a qmake5 that works and is the official way. Really, I don't care what qmake5 is and where it points to, so long as: a) it exists b) it works c) it's the official and documented way of creating Qt applications in Qt 5 Any other names are under the customer's taste. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development