On 11/23/2012 11:11 AM, Poenitz Andre wrote:
> Peter Hartmann wrote:
>> On 11/23/2012 12:12 AM, André Pönitz wrote:
>>> (...)
>>> The reality is that this guarantee often enough does not hold in
>>> practice. Vendors of "binary" Qt based application typically test their
>>> setup against one specific (often enough patched) version of Qt which
>>> is then shipped with the application. Users are not expected to switch
>>> Qt versions, except when upgrading the whole application. Insofar are
>>> rules like "we can't add symbols in patch releases" not much more then
>>> self-inflicted pain without measurable gain.
>>
>> This situation is different on mobile (and I guess embedded as well);
>> for BlackBerry10 we have one version of Qt on the device
>
> Do you intend to upgrade this version of Qt that's installed on the device
> without upgrading the applications using it?

yes, e.g. device updates and 3rd party apps in the store.

Peter

>
> Andre'
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential 
information, privileged material (including material protected by the 
solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public 
information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended 
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, 
please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your 
system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission 
by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to