On Nov 29, 2012, at 1:31 AM, Lorn Potter <lorn.pot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 29/11/2012, at 5:47 AM, Knoll Lars <lars.kn...@digia.com> wrote: > >> If maintainers for other repositories would like to get the same branches >> setup, please speak up and tell Sergio and Janne. Both have agreed to do >> most of the actual work of creating the branches in gerrit and setting up >> the CI system and a big thanks goes to them already now. > > Why not just do this as default, so all modules workflow are similar? It adds load to the CI system of having multiple branches under CI control. And it makes little sense for many of the research/labs projects. It certainly makes sense for add-ons such as qt3d, sensors etc., and I agree with you that we should branch these in the same way. Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
