On 29/11/2012, at 6:05 PM, Knoll Lars <lars.kn...@digia.com> wrote: > > On Nov 29, 2012, at 1:31 AM, Lorn Potter <lorn.pot...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On 29/11/2012, at 5:47 AM, Knoll Lars <lars.kn...@digia.com> wrote: >> >>> If maintainers for other repositories would like to get the same branches >>> setup, please speak up and tell Sergio and Janne. Both have agreed to do >>> most of the actual work of creating the branches in gerrit and setting up >>> the CI system and a big thanks goes to them already now. >> >> Why not just do this as default, so all modules workflow are similar? > > It adds load to the CI system of having multiple branches under CI control. > And it makes little sense for many of the research/labs projects. > > It certainly makes sense for add-ons such as qt3d, sensors etc., and I agree > with you that we should branch these in the same way. >
I wasn't meaning so much the research/labs projects, but add-ons. So, yes, please create these branches for QtSensors. I will ask Andrew about QtSystems. > Cheers, > Lars > Lorn Potter Senior Software Engineer, QtSensors/QtSensorGestures _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
