On quinta-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2013 22.22.40, Thiago A. Corrêa wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Jake Thomas Petroules > > <jake.petrou...@petroules.com> wrote: > > QtGui to make proper use of that abstraction, but then you have the > > problem > > of backporting it to Qt 4. Or you could duplicate the header across all 3 > > Sorry I'm jumping in the conversation without much knowleadge of those > APIs, but I don't see why it would be necessary to backport anything > to Qt4. QtGui could have new features without having to backport them > as far as I understand it. > If it would be best to extend QtGui to have a better user experience, > then a proposal to extend it should be done IMHO.
There will be no backporting to QtGui in Qt 4. However, if the developers want to do it, they can release a version of the addon that compiles and works with Qt 4, like the serial port people are trying to do. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
