On 02/05/2013 12:49 PM, Friedemann Kleint wrote: > - Nokia is also mentioned along with names of former employees in the > json style parser under widgets/styles. Btw, I am generally wondering > about it, it seems to add a new Json parser. Could it be replaced by > the Json classes of QtCore?
We have a task about that. I think it either needs to be replaced by Qt's json classes or put into 3rdparty. > > - Compilation of the branch under Windows fails with the attached > log. Something is probably wrong with #ifdefing/profiles? Great, thanks! Simon Hausmann wrote: > Let's put it this way: linux-g++* is just as fuzzy as android-g++* in what it > means. But we're not in the business of creating mathematical formulas, we're > in the business of making life easier for software developers. If we can make > it easier for people to port their app to Android, why don't we do it? I don't have any very strong opinion either way, so whatever the majority decides is fine by me, but since there's a disagreement: Could you please elaborate on what makes linux-android-g++ (or linux-g++-android for symmetry with maemo) simpler for the developer compared to android-g++? Technically I don't think Android is considered a Linux-distribution. Wouldn't this be similar to renaming the OSX mkspec to "macx-g++-darwin"? -- Eskil _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
