On 02/06/2013 04:07 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Jake Thomas Petroules
<jake.petrou...@petroules.com <mailto:jake.petrou...@petroules.com>>
wrote:
Surely you meant darwin-g++-macx. :)
I don't think the Android mkspec warrants having Linux in it
simply because it's such a radically different system in many
ways. Custom C++ library, different executable format, custom
packaging tools, custom UI stack, the fact that native apps can't
even be run standalone without Java glue (at least before 2.3)...
Linux would refer to the kernel just like in case of Maemo. It simply
cannot refer to the UI stack, packaging tools, executable format, and
what not as there is a good deal of permutation for those.
In addition to the confusion about "linux-android-g++" working only on
Linux host: one could say "android-g++" means Android works with any
kernel type. :-)
How about: it has only one kernel type and thus adding kernel type to
the mkspec is pointless.
Laszlo
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
