Why is that...? Jake Petroules Petroules Corporation (www.petroules.com) Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com Telephone: +1 (970) 587-3821
On Feb 25, 2013, at 11:12 AM, Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornem...@digia.com> wrote: > On 25/02/2013 16:27, Jake Thomas Petroules wrote: > >> I'd prefer Qt namespace with no platform indicators, i.e.: >> >> Qt::toHICON >> Qt::toHBITMAP >> Qt::toCGImageRef >> Qt::toNSString >> >> It's obvious to which platform each function belongs; there's no need to >> qualify it beyond necessary. If WinRT introduces an NSString class and OS X >> adds HBITMAPs only then should we think about adding the platform name to >> the function. :) > > That means we're restricting ourselves to type conversion functions? > A function that's potentially useful on more than one platform wouldn't be > possible. > > > BR, > > Joerg _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
