On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Hirvonen Olli <olli.hirvo...@digia.com>wrote:
> **2. **In some repositories company copyright is missing and > there is only original author copyright. Example:**** > > **** > > ** Copyright (C) 2012 Firstname Surname <em...@xyz.org>**** > > ** Contact: http://www.qt-project.org/ > Is that wrong? What if no one pays someone to work on a change? Also, perhaps you could make a qtqa checker script for these, run them, and publish the result so we can see the issues at a centralized place? For instance, we meant to fix everything in QtSerialPort a while ago, so I am wondering why it is still on your list. I guess this is a generic issue. Perhaps there could be a license checker bot, or just directly integrated into an existing bot like the sanity/doc checker? Laszlo
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
