The only macro that could make sense seems to be #define register I say +1 for removal since 'register' is just noise, and if any compiler actually still uses this flag it will typically just cause less optimized code.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com>wrote: > On sexta-feira, 14 de junho de 2013 11.44.00, Stephen Kelly wrote: > > This will be quite noisy for Qt and for users of Qt. Should we remove the > > use of register from Qt? Or replace it with Q_REGISTER which is empty > for > > c++11? > > Either remove or disable the warning. A macro makes no sense for this -- > too > ugly. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development > >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development