On sexta-feira, 14 de junho de 2013 23.24.50, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > On 14 June 2013 11:44, Stephen Kelly <stephen.ke...@kdab.com> wrote: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.clang.scm/74932 > > > > This will be quite noisy for Qt and for users of Qt. Should we remove the > > use of register from Qt? Or replace it with Q_REGISTER which is empty for > > c++11? > Am I right at assuming that this warning triggers only when compiling > C++ files in C++11 mode? If not, would it be possible we disable it > selectively, f.i. for code in 3rdparty?
C++11 did not change the meaning of the keyword. This is a completely made-up warning by Clang, like the GCC warning that says const in prvalue return types makes no sense or the one telling you to use () around && with ||. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
