On sexta-feira, 6 de setembro de 2013 19:52:47, David Faure wrote: > * relation to QNetworkReply? > If that one didn't exist yet, we'd definitely write it as a QJob subclass. > So instead, I propose to wrap QNetworkReply into a QNetworkJob or > something, in order to offer the QJob interface for QNAM requests. On one > hand this doesn't have to go in at the same time as QJob itself, but OTOH > it could be a real- world testcase for it, proving its usefulness and > correctness... > > Any other questions?
What if we put the QJob class and convenience derived classes like QNetworkRequestJob, QProcessJob, QThreadJob, etc. in one new library. This library could be extended later with more job types. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development