On quarta-feira, 2 de outubro de 2013 09:09:16, Olivier Goffart wrote: > It is working. We even got bug report for some corner case where it did > not, and I fixed those. (so they are used) > There is no test because you did not want to have one. But we could easily > add more auto tests. (It is really not that difficult) > And it is "forbidden" only because you decided so, but it is not actually > forbidden.
Circular definition. We agreed that it wasn't going to be supported, so I didn't want a test for something that we were allowed to break. We test the API contract, not the implementation. if we change our agreement that certain exceptions are allowed, then the tests for those conditions would be allowed. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development