On 24/01/2014, at 17.36, Alexis Menard <men...@kde.org> wrote:
>>
>> Again let's balance the cost of the maintenance of the code of 10.6 vs
>> supporting few users stuck in the past? If they must stick in the past for
>> various reasons (financial or others) then they can just use Qt4, it works
>> just fine for Mac OS 10.6 or even Qt5 released versions. Why such users
>> would care of modern Qt5 applications?
>
> Qt4 looks suboptimal on Mac OS. It still has problems with some of the list
> widgets. Among other things. Qt5 has several showstopper issues on Mac OS,
> some of which seems to finally being taken seriously (5.2.1?). You can’t ship
> a quality application on Mac OS with Qt5.0 - Qt.5.2.0.
>
>
>
> This is another topic.
>
>
> --
> Alexis Menard
I think it’s fairly relevant as a response to a claim that Qt on Mac works fine
on existing/previous Qt versions, when that’s not entirely the case. At the
very least, we may have different definitions of the term “works fine”.
It is another topic, a topic which I’ve tried to raise on this list before with
very limited interest, much like my recent letter to Digia on the same topic.
Anyways. Thanks for the responses - I’ll leave the subject before I get too
unpopular ;-)
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
