Hi Bo,
> On 14 Oct 2014, at 10:21, Bo Thorsen <b...@vikingsoft.eu> wrote: > > Den 14-10-2014 08:59, Kurt Pattyn skrev: >> how do these applications comply with MISRA? > > MISRA is impossible to comply with for a framework. For example, consider the > required rule 0-1-11: "There shall be no unused parameters (named or unnamed) > in non-virtual functions." > > With this, void f(int /*no_longer_used*/) is illegal. For any non-trivial > framework that keeps binary compatibility, this will over time be hit. On second thought, I think this is a very bad example. Even while you keep binary compatibility, you break semantics here. This is typically a case where one should break binary compatibility. I am sure (or at least I hope so) that Qt does not allow these kind of things. Furthermore I am only concerned with the public part of the Qt framework including generated code. I am talking about missing default switch statements, incomplete switch statements, implicit conversion between signed and unsigned integers, aso. Cheers, Kurt _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
