Kurt Pattyn <pattyn.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 14 Oct 2014, at 10:21, Bo Thorsen <b...@vikingsoft.eu> wrote: > > > > Den 14-10-2014 08:59, Kurt Pattyn skrev: > >> how do these applications comply with MISRA? > > > > MISRA is impossible to comply with for a framework. For example, > > consider the required rule 0-1-11: "There shall be no unused parameters > > (named or unnamed) in non-virtual functions." > > > > With this, void f(int /*no_longer_used*/) is illegal. For any > > non-trivial framework that keeps binary compatibility, this will over time > > be hit. > > On second thought, I think this is a very bad example. Even while you keep > binary compatibility, you break semantics here. > This is typically a case where one should break binary compatibility.
Are you seriously asking for a new major Qt release just because a new implementation of some function does not require some parameter anymore? Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
