On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 12:58:45PM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Monday 09 February 2015 21:21:12 André Pönitz wrote: > > I don't think the argument of whitespace changes making the history > > hard to read carries a lot of weight in a git world. > > Whitespaces can be ignored in git diff and git blame.
This sounds a bit like 'whitespace changes in passing are Mostly Harmless'. Which I happen to be fine with. > You can't do that with > C++ keywords. Would that be an argument against replacing '= 0' by '= Q_NULLPTR' under the 'fix whitespace in passing' rule? Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
