On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 07:53:23PM +0100, Marc Mutz wrote: > On Tuesday 10 February 2015 17:28:09 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Tuesday 10 February 2015 15:34:45 Knoll Lars wrote: > > > +1. I’m ok with us making sure our headers are clean against warnings (if > > > possible), but I don’t see a real need to enforce it’s usage in > > > implementations. > > > > Fair enough. But how about allowing people to change zeroes to Q_NULLPTR? > > Even more importantly: what about new code?
Can't you simply wait until 'nullptr' is available? Do you really *need* to use macros instead of the core language? Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
