On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:25:52PM +0100, Mathias Hasselmann wrote: > > > Am 10.02.2015 um 20:13 schrieb André Pönitz: > >On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 07:53:23PM +0100, Marc Mutz wrote: > >>On Tuesday 10 February 2015 17:28:09 Thiago Macieira wrote: > >>>On Tuesday 10 February 2015 15:34:45 Knoll Lars wrote: > >>>>+1. I’m ok with us making sure our headers are clean against warnings (if > >>>>possible), but I don’t see a real need to enforce it’s usage in > >>>>implementations. > >>> > >>>Fair enough. But how about allowing people to change zeroes to Q_NULLPTR? > >> > >>Even more importantly: what about new code? > > > >Can't you simply wait until 'nullptr' is available? Do you really *need* > >to use macros instead of the core language? > > Do you want me to count your uses of the foreach macro in Qt Creator? ;-)
Which one-char C++ core alternative to 'foreach' do you have in mind? Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
